|
I shall refrain from any polite tones on this, consumption of child exploitation in drawn form should result in a permanent place on a sex offender's registry, a lifetime ban on working with children and chemical castration. That is my view and I want to make that clear.
Amongst the internet discourse, the word ‘Paedophile’ is thrown constantly, on par only with the left wing accusations of fascism. This has only aided these offenders, able to hide behind past weak accusations, the word no longer has the weight as it's used so commonly. The accusation of noncery was something that would warrant a gasp and an earthquake reaction, but now it's often met with a sigh. It's got to the point if someone has a genuine attraction to children is able to hide in the weeds of false accusations on previous people and as a result deflect. But what examples? Surely these degenerates are locked into the corners of the dark web? Well, sadly they aren’t.
Within Anime, it's celebrated with ‘memes’ to a disgusting degree. Crunchy roll a global brand with far-reaching power hosted its own conference with the infamous character ‘digibro’ digibro wasn’t just a figure in the background he was in fact on the main stage and focused with large crowds, platforming him to intense crowds and with that his views. What are his views? His quote’ “It means I am a huge fan of illustration of little girls getting fucked”[1] After saying such words of sin he was still in-fact hosted by Crunchyroll.[2]This is a concerning and degenerate trend Pedophiles have infiltrated and are now platformed within these community. The counter these degenerates have is the subject of ‘lolicon’ that the subject of that means it isn’t real children and thus isn’t harming or pedophilia. Here I will try to debunk such things.
The stance of Lolicon isn’t pedophilia and users shouldn’t be sanctioned.
Lolicon is the pornographic depiction of children in animated form. This is in fact illegal in the UK[3] and other countries. This deception can vary but the definition is sexualized children in animated form. Now, the argument is “it isn’t real” and thus they aren’t attracted to children. But a simple logical view will show that this is wrong. If one is attracted to anime deceptions of ‘femboys’ (feminine dressed boys) then we can say they are attracted to men in feminine form, while only viewed in animated form this may seem separate from real life but the attraction is still carried over to real life, if you are attracted to the animated depiction of this then it will surely be carried over into real life as the animation is a reflection on real life pornography. So in short, someone with this attraction will find themselves still having the attraction if they see a ‘femboy’ in real life this isn’t strictly locked into the animated presentation of this fetish this carries over into real life.
As a result we can say that person who has an attraction to lolicon has an attraction to children, they are just expressing that through the animated medium. So we can say the person in question is attracted to children. Someone attracted towards children is defined as a paedophile and this gets dangerous that someone who could view and enjoy this content on a constant basis still has no restrictions on’ working with or near children, adopting children or even talking to children online. These people are pedophiles they are attracted to the depiction of children. Please I ask the reader would you be comfortable allowing a self admitted pedophile near children? To have the ability to work, adopt them and even have the ability to work as a teacher. We are putting children at risk by not addressing this, viewers of lolicon are paedophiles to put it bluntly.
Person A has an attraction to X in animated form, X’s real life counterpart is readily available to person A, the animated form of X and the other form of it are the same. Person A is attracted to X which would label them. We as a society agree that being attracted or having a past with harming X should lead to a separation from X, then how come this animated form of X isn’t treated the same? They both share the same danger to the subject of X.
In conclusion; viewers of this degeneracy should apprehended and put on a list and chemically castrated to better protect children around them, enforce laws that doesn’t allow them to be near schools and be put on a permanent child endangerment registry. Giving them an option to turn themselves in with the information on where they found this content will lead to them still being put on a list and castrated but will be aided in finding accommodation away from their residence if they in fact too close to a school.
As I said prior the issue of lolicon has infested anime conventions, now surely we should just stay vigilante of anime community, surely this is a one off? Well let me explain how dire the situation is, because its spread even further;
lolicon/pedophiles within leftist spaces
I say this without going the usual line of “this person said age of consent is 16” or something right wing circles can do and clip someone out of context, this person has a disturbing obsession with the subject. No one outside of pedophiles would bring up this subject as much as this individual.
How much degenerate things has he said? Well thank the lord someone has already provided a nice set of timestamps for me.
Ian Anthony Kochinski otherwise known on the internet as “Vaush” is one of the biggest leftist YouTubers on the platform, self described “Anaracho communist” vaush is an individual of many questionable actions, (Sexual harassment[4], [5]bigtory towards people of my ethnicity for some reason? [6]And anti Semite)
(source; https://www.reddit.com/r/Enough_Vaush_Spam/comments/ou0d2u/vaush_has_a_very_disturbing_preoccupation_with/ )
Vaush said he “drew Undyne and Frisk fucking Chara”, characters who are aged 11-13 and 12-14.
Vaush offered to “draw Rick and Morty yaoi in a dimension where Morty is 18.”
Vaush drew a ‘loli Steven.’ (Censored for obvious reasons.)
Someone made a ‘joke’ complaining about how “if you fuck a 12 year old you're a pedo but if you fuck a 20 year old who looks 12 you're also a pedo”. Vaush replied "I love you."
Someone in Destiny's discord said people who watch CP should get a life sentence and Vaush said he wanted to "debate cp over voice."
Vaush ‘joked’ about fucking capitalist’s “neglected children.”
Vaush ‘joked’ about posting his CP collection.
Vaush ‘joked’ about Destiny’s ‘ethical child porn’ diagram being a quality diagram.. He has also praised Destiny’s stance on CP on numerous occasions.
In response to someone saying ‘legalise loli’ Vaush replied “loli is already legal, just not child porn.” Loli is child porn and it is very illegal in many parts of the world.
Someone found evidence their neighbour was looking at CP of 5 year old girls and vaush replied "have you considered the possibility that this may have been ethical child porn?"
Vaush appears to have a keen interest in “holodeck loli sex.” 1 2
Vaush told Poppy (one of the girls he sexually harassed) “I do imagine you looking like a loli.” and said “isn’t that cool? we have another thing in common...neither of us like raping children.”
Vaush has defended the consumption of child pornography because ‘there’s no ethical consumption under capitalism’.
Vaush stated that under socialism the age of consent "should be lowered"
Vaush asked if anyone on Discord had ‘fucked an adult as a minor’ then replied with unironically hot when someone responded positively.
An ‘old close friend’ of Vaush has alleged that Vaush once admitted to viewing images of child pornography.
Here’s Vaush admitting to ownership of a Twitter account that shares drawn child pornography.
Vaush stated “there’s a difference between exploring child sexuality and sexualising children”
Vaush ‘joked’ about owning CP.
Vaush said: “If you are not paying for child pornography there is no argument in favour of morally condeming people who view it.
Vaush asked someone “what did pedos ever do to you?” Then refered to ‘Salem Pedophile trials.
Vaush seems to be preoccupied with child-sex bots, ‘joking’ that his professors “never want to talk about pedophile sex bots,”
Vaush stated he has "mixed opinions" on shadman, a child porn artist who he gave a cute nickname for some reason. Vaush then said he "has never cum to a shadman comic but values his political commentary." Vaush then mentioned a specific shadman comic by name. Source
Vaush stated that he “doesn’t think (drawn child pornography) should be illegal.”
Vaush said “I have yet to hear a convincing moral or legal argument as to why possession of child pornography should be illegal.”
Vaush challenged someone to a debate about "Loli sexbots." Vaush ‘joked’ about drawing a 12 year old sexbot being fucked. then mocked someone for (presumably) not wanting to fuck a child-sex bot.
Vaush seemingly believes it’s possible for adults to rape children without it being child abuse.
Vaush asked "if the sexbot is just a toy then why does it matter if an adult fucks a kid robot?"
Vaush said "if you really really wanna fuck children, wait 20 years for VR loli porn and dont tell anybody you use it."
Vaush claims to have a “nuanced perspective” on paedophilia.
Vaush said he’s “conceptually ok with the age of consent being lowered.”
Vaush joked, “she has me blocked...fellow pedos.”
|